Welcome!

Adrian Burns, Auctioneer.
I sell and write about antiques, collectibles and the auction business. I own Burns Auction & Appraisal LLC and am a licensed auctioneer and appraiser in the state of Ohio.

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Fighting the flood of the fake tintypes

This piece is scheduled to appear in  future publications issued by the Michigan State Auctioneers Association and Ohio Auctioneers Association.

If you haven't seen one yet, you will.
Civil War tintypes that seem the holy grail. Soldiers with two or even three guns stuffed into their belts. Rare Confederate views. Black soldiers of the Great Rebellion. The cream of the crop to collectors.
Except they're not. They're fake.
The bogus tintypes have begun to flood eBay in a trend that seems to have taken hold in recent months. While some are sold as reproductions, others are sold as the real deal. Even those labeled as fakes bring money in the hundreds of dollars. Those that aren't labeled as fakes do, too, as unsuspecting buyers snatch up what appear to be great deals. And why does anyone pay hundreds of dollars for the images disclosed as reproductions? Because they'll probably sell them as the real deal for a lot more.
It's only a matter of time before they wind up on your doorstep, as consignments for the next auction. Some will surely knowingly peddle these fakes as the real deal. But countless others will get a hold of fakes they bought as the real thing from someone else, either on eBay, at a flea market or another auction. And what will they do?
They'll bring the image to auction, put it back on eBay or otherwise offer it as the real deal.
You may very well get excited, as will your bidders. The price might soar, and yet another sorry buyer will end up with a pricey tintype with little value.
I can't proclaim to know the motivations of the handful of eBay sellers that move these fakes on a near daily basis. I'm not even entirely sure how these things are made. I bought one to examine it, and had the seller pull out of the deal, supposedly because of an eBay sanction. It's too bad. I would have liked to examine the thing in the flesh. I still will as soon as I buy one and get it delivered.
In the mean time, here are some tips.
Of course, looking at as many of the real thing as possible never hurts.
Real tintypes are attracted to a magnet (tintypes are indeed not tin, but on a thin sheet of iron), and most often have a deep and rich contrast and are black and gray or black and a deep gray brown. Those that I have seen online that are clearly fakes have a strange color. Green in tone, or blue, and with little contrast. Their backs are often unusual too.
Just about all real tintypes have a back that japanned black or is brown in color, but has not had any heavy coating painted on.
These fakes, though, seem to wind up with a coating on the back for whatever reason. That's another thing to watch out for.
 While low quality repros have been floating around for quite a while, these better copies today seem to be coming out in larger numbers. They're sure to end up at your auction house soon, and they seem to get harder to spot by the day.
The sad result will be a depressed price for the legitimate item. I've already been contacted by one seller who had a 'Reb tintype returned after a buyer accused it of being a fake. I'm convinced it was real, but as soon as the fakes flood the market everyone becomes suspicious.

Here are a few fake tintype images from eBay, with my thoughts on them:

This image clearly lacks contrast depths of a genuine tintype. Gradation in tone is also poor. It fades from light to black very quickly. It also has a uniform yellow color.



Back appears coated, unlike most tintypes


This lack of tint and contrast, along with the green color and complete lack of surface wear, belies this as a fake.


The back had a treatment similar to the above tintype, but was sanded to add "age." It was also bent a few times to add the appearance of age. As with all antiques, one must look for signs of authentic age.


Poor contrast and color. These fakes are often tinted, and often elaborately, to add some sense of authenticity. Tinting does not make a tintype authentic. In fact, too much of it might call it into question if some of the other issues are also present.



Also has the sanded back, worn in a way that is not also apparent on the front. Pure fakery.



Excessive tinting in the flag, but no tinting elsewhere. Lack of contrast and tone. Strange green color.


Treated back.



Again, the strangely tinted flag and odd tone.



This image is trickier. It has been cut to an oval, and had paper applied to the back as if it once resided in an album. Do not be fooled. Look closely at the treated back and odd tone on the front. 


Again, poor contrast and tone/color gradation.



A strange blue color and little contrast and gradation.


This one is trickier, but still has a very sharp transition from dark to light, which gives it away, as does some other strange bleeding in the colors at his elbow to our right.


And the back has the treatment that gives it away.


Please do not be fooled by these. If you come across an image and aren't sure, don't hesitate to contact me at adrian@burnsbid.com

12 comments:

  1. Great article! Good to know, thanks for the information!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, thank you - I had no idea, even though I don't collect tintypes. Are any other early photography groups being affected by forgeries, too? (daguerreotypes, ambrotypes, etc.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've seen a few fake ambrotypes. Modern dags are made today, but not passed off as fakes. I think that ambrotypes and dags are much too difficult to make in any way that would be convincing - and worth the time. But I wouldn't rule them out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, actually I have seen some "fake" daguerreotypes before, though they are generally tintypes that are put into either an old or new case and passed off on naive buyers are actual daguerreotypes. Some are obvious, some are not. Others are true daguerreotypes but are modern, typically of subjects that command high prices such as American Indians (almost all of those on ebay now are fakes of some kind).
      But even sticking an old tintype into a sealed wooden case can be quite convincing to unsuspecting bidders.

      Delete
  4. Thanks very much for your information. Reminds me of the Tiffany glass and bronze that were (are?) being copied in Japan and China. They were of fine quality and made without marks to deliberately allow them to be passed off as the real item.
    Again, thanks very much.
    Gregory Hubbard

    ReplyDelete
  5. Gregory: wherever there is big money, expect this kind of activity!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Any thoughts on these listings?http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Tin-Type-Photo-Photograph-BABE-RUTH-ROOKIE-YANKEES-Proof-Plates-1-1-/370601055349?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item56498b5475#ht_500wt_909
    The seller claims to have found them in an attic along with civil war items and an Abe Lincoln tintype.

    ReplyDelete
  7. great article!, i look at the tin reprints on ebay and feel like crying or killing someone. i buy both paintings and photography . first it happend with paintings!, in 10 ebay years 99% became bad to fine fakes. but tintypes were untouched! and now, they are just demolishing this beautiful hobby and market. i sadly found out that tintypes are so much easier to fake and harder to detect on the computer screen than paintings...
    also sellers play with scanner, camera brightness, make holes and scratch the photo, and the photos are so small and tin easy to handle all one (me) can do is stare at a photo for hours before i buy it and pray... so irritating!

    thank you for the fine article

    ohad

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good article! I have a number of old tin-types (some of which are family actually) and have seen many over the years....and of course a lot on ebay. Not the least bit surprised at seeing fakes now, as fake daguerreotypes also started to appear on there about 10 years ago.

    In the examples you show above, some are screaming fakes, especially the second one and the last one. Aside from the backs of many that have that same odd, shinny coating there is something else I notice about a couple of them.
    It is the faces: in a few I immediately noticed the expression as well as the "look" to them. After seeing so many genuine old photos, you get a feel after a while.
    The faces in a few just do not look "right"---that is, in the mid-1800s when someone sat for a portrait, it was not a trifle affair. They took it seriously, especially if they were veterans and most have a certain expression to their faces. Smiles are rare (and costly), but the 2nd one, of the bearded man holding his coat with both hands: that one jumped out at me...it would be very unusual for a man in the era to pose in such a way.

    ReplyDelete
  9. https://www.facebook.com/sextonbasilica?ref=hlNovember 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM

    Thanks Adrian. I made a fake tintype myself (just for myself). It is possible that it is a fake tintype of a fake. What happened was that when I first started collecting I discovered that collodion is, in fact, nitro cellulose lacquer or nail polish. So if I got a damaged tintype, flaking, badly scratched, I would heat up clear nail polish a bit and pour it on. This worked wonderfully and I was entirely pleased with myself until I tried it on a post mortem baby, not really even that badly scratched, and, to my everlasting horror, the whole image just disintegrated right before my eyes! I had taken pictures of it before this procedure thank goodness, so she wasn't entirely lost to the world. Much later I took a tin type making workshop and they told us we could make a tintype of an image on the computer if we wanted. I immediately pulled up my poor little friend and she is now, once again, a tintype although it is perfectly obvious that she is unlike the usual ones. As you point out, the tone is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 12/20 14 theres a bunch on ebay right now in the civil war category marked as repros but will soon make a comeback as the real deal

    ReplyDelete